Saturday, July 25, 2009

Section 32 (Pleas)

(1) Save as hereafter provided in this section, it shall be no defence in a prosecution under this Act to prove merely that the accused was ignorant of the nature, substance or quality of the drug in respect of which the offence has been committed or of the circumstances of its manufacture or import, or that a purchaser, having bought only for the purpose of test or analysis, has not been prejudiced by the sale.

(2) A drug shall not be deemed to be misbranded or adulterated or sub-standard only by reason of the fact that there has been added thereto some innocuous substance or. ingredient because the same is required for the manufacture or preparation of the drug fit for carriage or consumption and not to increase the bulk, weight or measure of the drug or to conceal its inferior quality or other defect or there is a decomposed substance which is the result of a natural process of decomposition: Provided that such decomposition is not due to any negligence on the part of the manufacturer or the drug or the dealer thereof and that it does not render the drug injurious to health or does not make it substandard.

(3) A person, not being the manufacturer of a drug or his agent for the distribution thereof, shall not be liable for a contravention of section 23 if he proves--

(a) that he did not know, and could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained, that the drug in any way contravened the provision of this Act and that the drug while in his possession remained in the same state as when he acquired it; and

(b) that he acquired the drug from a duly licensed manufacturer or his authorised agent or an importer or an indentor resident in Pakistan under a written warrant, in the prescribed form stating, in particular. the batch number of the drug and signed by such person that the drug does not in any way contravene the provisions of Section 23 and that the drug while in his possession was properly stored and remained in the same state as when he acquired it and that the drug has been manufactured by a manufacturer holding a valid licence to manufacture drugs and permission to manufacture that drug:

Provided that a defence under clause (b) shall be open to a person only--

(i) if he has, within seven days of the service on him of the summons, sent to the Inspector a copy of the warranty with a written notice stating that he intends to rely upon it and giving the name and address of the warrantor, and

(ii) if he proves that he has, within the same period, sent written notice of such intention to the said warrantor.

No comments:

Post a Comment